Nuget update to "Umbraco Cms Core" v 7.15.3 messes with dependent package versions?
I have noticed this behavior on two separate Umbraco Cloud sites. Both have been updated to version 7.15.3 by the Cloud automated mechanism. Both have the same Visual Studio structure - the .Web project and the .Core class project.
After pulling the upgrade via GIT, it makes sense to use NuGet to update the related .Core project to the same Umbraco version...
However, when I use the "Consolidate" tab on the VS NuGet interface, and update the .Core project to use Umbraco Cms Core v7.15.3... Suddenly I have 22 additional NuGet packages which need to be "consolidated". These are all Umbraco dependencies. The "updated" version on the .Core project is a few versions higher than in the .Web project, which is very strange.
I'm not sure if the Umbraco Cloud update just failed to update the package references for the .Web project... or there is something fishy with the Nuget package for Umbraco.Cms.Core...
Okay, so I am thinking that the issue is that the Umbraco Cloud update didn't update the references to the dependent packages, because if I use the Package Manager Console in VS, and with the .Web project selected and run:
This does now show a bunch of changed files in the /bin/ directory for the .Web project when I look at GIT, which seems to indicate that those files weren't actually updated via Umbraco Cloud's update procedure.
I'm not sure what to make of this, exactly, but my local version of the site seems to run just fine - no issues on the front-end or the back-office as far as I can tell...
FYI: Received response from Umbraco Cloud Support:
Hi Heather,
I've been able to reproduce the issue you was experiencing. It's not
that the packages aren't updated though from what I can see. It's that
the packages.config is not updated correctly for all packages that
were involved in that update.
The Umbraco packages are added correctly but when you check the other
packages you will see that they are still displaying the old version.
You can see this by checking the details of the dll files in the bin
folder. Here's an example of one of them. I found an issue on the
Cloud tracker where a similar problem is reported -
https://github.com/umbraco/Umbraco.Cloud.Issues/issues/67
It was believed to have been solved but I'll ask Sebastiaan about it
and either reopen or create a new issue on it. So the bottom line is
that the project is upgraded correctly but the information about what
was updated is not.
Nuget update to "Umbraco Cms Core" v 7.15.3 messes with dependent package versions?
I have noticed this behavior on two separate Umbraco Cloud sites. Both have been updated to version 7.15.3 by the Cloud automated mechanism. Both have the same Visual Studio structure - the .Web project and the .Core class project.
After pulling the upgrade via GIT, it makes sense to use NuGet to update the related .Core project to the same Umbraco version...
However, when I use the "Consolidate" tab on the VS NuGet interface, and update the .Core project to use Umbraco Cms Core v7.15.3... Suddenly I have 22 additional NuGet packages which need to be "consolidated". These are all Umbraco dependencies. The "updated" version on the .Core project is a few versions higher than in the .Web project, which is very strange.
I'm not sure if the Umbraco Cloud update just failed to update the package references for the .Web project... or there is something fishy with the Nuget package for Umbraco.Cms.Core...
Has anyone else seen this in their projects?
Okay, so I am thinking that the issue is that the Umbraco Cloud update didn't update the references to the dependent packages, because if I use the Package Manager Console in VS, and with the .Web project selected and run:
The .Web dependencies get updated as well.
This does now show a bunch of changed files in the /bin/ directory for the .Web project when I look at GIT, which seems to indicate that those files weren't actually updated via Umbraco Cloud's update procedure.
I'm not sure what to make of this, exactly, but my local version of the site seems to run just fine - no issues on the front-end or the back-office as far as I can tell...
FYI: Received response from Umbraco Cloud Support:
is working on a reply...
This forum is in read-only mode while we transition to the new forum.
You can continue this topic on the new forum by tapping the "Continue discussion" link below.