I have installed the 301 URL Tracker version 3.3 on my Umbraco 7.1.6 site, when running an SQL profiler to see all SQL calls that my system do to the database I can find a lot of calls to the icUrlTracker database table. Should not these calls be cached? Or have I missed something?
The SQL command that is sent may differ from 20 to 50 times per Umbraco page, and every call is exactly the same:
exec sp_executesql N'SELECT * FROM icUrlTracker WHERE Is404 = 0 AND ForceRedirect = @forceRedirect AND RedirectRootNodeId = @redirectRootNodeId AND OldRegex IS NOT NULL ORDER BY Inserted DESC',N'@forceRedirect int,@redirectRootNodeId int',@forceRedirect=1,@redirectRootNodeId=1076
A lot of calls to the database
I have installed the 301 URL Tracker version 3.3 on my Umbraco 7.1.6 site, when running an SQL profiler to see all SQL calls that my system do to the database I can find a lot of calls to the icUrlTracker database table. Should not these calls be cached? Or have I missed something?
The SQL command that is sent may differ from 20 to 50 times per Umbraco page, and every call is exactly the same:
exec sp_executesql N'SELECT * FROM icUrlTracker WHERE Is404 = 0 AND ForceRedirect = @forceRedirect AND RedirectRootNodeId = @redirectRootNodeId AND OldRegex IS NOT NULL ORDER BY Inserted DESC',N'@forceRedirect int,@redirectRootNodeId int',@forceRedirect=1,@redirectRootNodeId=1076
Could you use Github for issues please?
Oh, sorry. I just thought I would report bugs to Github not questions, because I am not sure it is a bug.
Now I have posted it to Github. :)
I understand, but it's impossible to manage reports on our umbraco.
Some overview is needed and I use Github for that ;-)
This might be a bug, or something that should be improved, so thanks for the suggestion and I'll reply on Github when there's any news.
is working on a reply...
This forum is in read-only mode while we transition to the new forum.
You can continue this topic on the new forum by tapping the "Continue discussion" link below.