Copied to clipboard

Flag this post as spam?

This post will be reported to the moderators as potential spam to be looked at


  • Craig100 1078 posts 2366 karma points c-trib
    Mar 09, 2015 @ 18:30
    Craig100
    0

    Lots of trace log errors on localhost

     

    Just thought I'd check. I'm seeing lots of these errors in the trace log when running from VS2013:

    SEOChecker: Error in HttpModule for url rewriting
    System.UriFormatException: Invalid URI: The hostname could not be parsed.
    at System.Uri.CreateThis(String uri, Boolean dontEscape, UriKind uriKind)
    at System.Uri..ctor(String uriString)
    at System.UriBuilder.get_Uri()
    at SEOChecker.Core.Extensions.UrlBuilderExtensions.ToUri(UrlBuilder builder)
    at SEOChecker.Core.Extensions.HttpContextExtensions.RawUri(HttpContext context)
    at SEOChecker.Core.Extensions.HttpContextExtensions.RawUrl(HttpContext context)
    at SEOChecker.HttpModules.UrlModule.(Object , EventArgs )

    I don't get them on the live server.

    As I'm developing I'm also getting issues reading an Archetype that purports to be having problems with SEOChecker. Details in this issue: https://our.umbraco.org/projects/backoffice-extensions/archetype/sound-off!/62014-Accessing-Archetype-from-own-class (5th post refers).

    Are these two issues connected?

    Thanks,

    Craig


  • Jan Skovgaard 11258 posts 23500 karma points MVP 7x admin c-trib
    Mar 15, 2015 @ 10:20
    Jan Skovgaard
    0

    Hi Craig

    Just wondering if you have setup a local hostname on the rootnode in Umbraco when developing locally?

    /Jan

  • Craig100 1078 posts 2366 karma points c-trib
    Mar 15, 2015 @ 10:36
    Craig100
    0

    Hi Jan,

    it was finally resolved in this thread: https://our.umbraco.org/projects/backoffice-extensions/archetype/sound-off!/62014-Accessing-Archetype-from-own-class  

    A kind of multi-disciplinary approach, including a package update ;)

    Also the usual lack of clear documentation with real-world examples to guide you through perfect storm of dynamic vs. strongly typed vs. vanilla vs. property convertor syntax. It's my personal dev nightmare to be honest.

    Cheers,

    Craig

  • Jan Skovgaard 11258 posts 23500 karma points MVP 7x admin c-trib
    Mar 15, 2015 @ 10:41
    Jan Skovgaard
    0

    Hi Craig

    Aaah, ok - Good you figured it out :)

    Yes indeed sometimes the dynamic vs. strongly typed stuff can be a big source of confusion. I feel the same way and I think that it's something HQ are trying to improve in the future.

    Happy sunday mate!

    /Jan

  • This forum is in read-only mode while we transition to the new forum.

    You can continue this topic on the new forum by tapping the "Continue discussion" link below.

Please Sign in or register to post replies